代数学笔记——有限群的表示论(一)
本文使用 Zhihu On VSCode 创作并发布
这个专题主要介绍有限群的线性表示。粗略地说,我们把有限群中的元素看作是某个有限维线性空间上的(可逆)线性变换,从而来研究群的性质。本文主要介绍群表示论的最基础的知识,并介绍 Maschke 定理,这个定理在群表示论的教材中往往一开始就会碰到,虽然证明并不难,但它在有限群的表示论中起着至关重要的作用。
Let be a finite dimensional vector space over a field
. Let
be a finite group. A linear representation of
in
is a group homomorphism
.
Define the group algebra with obvious addition and multiplication. Then linear representations of
are the same things as
-modules, since any group homomorphism
can be linearly extended to a
-algebra homomorphism
.
Let ,
be two representations of
. We say a linear map
is a morphism of representations of
if the diagram
commutes for all . This exactly means that
is a
-module homomorphism.
Remark
In fact a representation of can be viewed as a functor
from the category
consisting of a single object
whose morphisms are elements of the group
, to the category of
-vector spaces, sending a group element
to
. A natural transformation from
to
is exactly a linear map
such that the diagram above commutes, i.e. a morphism of representations is exactly a natural transformation. Then we say two representations
and
of
are isomorphic if they are naturally isomorphic as functors.
Definition
We say that a representation is simple (or irreducible) if
has no
-submodules except
.
Note that there are only finitely many irreducible representations up to isomorphism. This is because any irreducible -module is isomorphic to a quotient module of
, thus is a composition factor of
, and
has finitely many composition factors.
If ,
are two representations of
, then we can define their
(1) direct sum
,
.
(2) tensor product
,
Suppose that ,
are two representations of
. For any linear map
, define its trace to be
Then is a morphism of
-modules.
Suppose ,
are irreducible representations. By Schur's lemma, if
and
are not isomorphic, then
. If
, and
, then
with
(by taking trace).
Theorem[Maschke]
The group algebra is semisimple if and only if
.
Proof
Suppose . Then for any representation
, and any
-submodule
of
, let
be any subspace of
such that
. Let
be the projection map with respect to this composition. Then
is a morphism of
-modules and we have
. Thus the exact sequence of
-modules
splits. Hence as
-modules. Therefore,
is semisimple.
On the other hand, if , then
. Hence
is contained in the nilradical of
. Thus the Jacobson radical is not 0. So
is not semisimple.
Remark
Note that if is semisimple, then
is irreducible if and only if
is indecomposable. In this case, every representation of
is a direct sum of irreducible representations, by induction on
.