The website uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Privacy Policy.
I Agree
blank_error__heading
blank_error__body
Text direction?

Do My Tweets Really Threaten China’s National Security?

The Communist Party was always going to try to tame Hong Kong, but its latest efforts are something else.

By Jimmy Lai

Mr. Lai is a publisher in Hong Kong.

ImagePresident Xi Jinping of China reaching to vote in favor of new national security laws for Hong Kong during the National People’s Congress in Beijing on Thursday.
President Xi Jinping of China reaching to vote in favor of new national security laws for Hong Kong during the National People’s Congress in Beijing on Thursday.Credit...Mark Schiefelbein/Associated Press

HONG KONG — I am the chairman and majority owner of Apple Daily, one of Hong Kong’s largest newspapers, and since the city’s return to China in 1997, I have feared that one day the Chinese Communist Party would grow tired not only of Hong Kong’s free press but also of its free people. That day has come.

On Thursday, the party, acting through the National People’s Congress in Beijing, approved a plan to pass national security laws for Hong Kong that will mark the end of free expression and many of the individual liberties so cherished in the city.

Hong Kong is moving from the rule of law to rule by law, with the Chinese Communist Party determining all the new rules of this game.

Apologists for China, led by the Hong Kong chief executive, Carrie Lam, claim that the new legislation will only cover subversion, calls for secession, terrorism and other acts that truly threaten China’s national security. But the Hong Kong people are not fooled.

Since the ascent of Xi Jinping as China’s leader in late 2012 and early 2013, Hong Kong booksellers have been kidnapped and forcibly taken to the mainland, democracy activists have been beaten up by pro-Beijing thugs from the local triads and the city’s once-much-respected police force has turned on the people in the most brutal way. Even sanctuaries of freedom from outside the city are now imperiled here.

I joined Twitter recently, and started posting messages about the new law last weekend, just after the Chinese Communist Party first mentioned it:

Within a day, an article in the official Communist Party mouthpiece Global Times, citing experts, called my tweets “evidence of subversion” under the proposed national security law — this, even before the National People’s Congress formally endorsed the legislation on Thursday.

I have always thought I might one day be sent to jail for my publications or for my calls for democracy in Hong Kong. But for a few tweets, and because they are said to threaten the national security of mighty China? That’s a new one, even for me.

Hong Kong is a free society. Hong Kongers say what we want to say — at least, as Ms. Lam put it on Tuesday, “for the time being.” After the proposed national security law is enacted in Hong Kong — which could happen before the fall and the next local legislative elections — we will be able to say only what the Chinese government tolerates. Every sentence, every word will carry the risk of potential punishment on the mainland.

When it comes to free speech, this law will remodel Hong Kong so that it becomes like the rest of China.

It didn’t have to be this way. Although Hong Kong has been troublesome for Beijing since 1997 — there were protests in 2003 over another national security law and calls for true universal suffrage during the Umbrella Movement of 2014 — this was manageable trouble. But then last spring Ms. Lam, in a spectacular miscalculation, attempted to ram through the Hong Kong legislature an extradition bill that would have allowed the Chinese Communist Party to drag Hong Kongers to the mainland to be tried for various crimes, including political crimes.

That bill was an attempt by Beijing to control Hong Kong on the sly. The people saw through the move and pushed back, with mass marches and months of protests.

After they beat back the extradition bill and it was formally withdrawn, Mr. Xi and the Chinese Communist Party dropped all pretense of noninterference in Hong Kong.

For those of you who are not in Hong Kong, it’s important to realize that even many pro-Beijing business tycoons let it be known that they opposed the 2019 extradition bill because it would have shattered the protections afforded by being in Hong Kong, including those that undergird the stability of the financial and business sectors.

Now, the new national security law goes much further, obviating the need for anything like the extradition bill. Chinese security agencies and police bureaus are expected to be set up or operate in Hong Kong, to handle everything from supposed subversion and illegal democratic activities to the enforcement of patriotic education in schools.

If the extradition bill was a rifle aimed at our rights, the national security legislation is a machine gun.

Mr. Xi is no doubt taking advantage of this peculiar moment, while the free world, especially the United States, is engulfed in the coronavirus pandemic. Why let a good crisis go to waste? Virus or not, though, Hong Kong was always going to be tamed under the Chinese Communist Party. As far back as July 2003 and that earlier attempt at passing national security legislation, under Hong Kong’s own Basic Law, the Chinese Communist Party was already working at undoing the city’s unique freedoms.

And back then, like today, even as China represses Hong Kong, it tries to convince the world that it is acting legitimately and openly; it invokes process and procedures, laws and regulations. This is a charade, and it has long ago been dismissed by most Hong Kong people.

Yet the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda machine rolls on, offering a few talking points to Beijing loyalists and a semblance of cover to compliant governments and an international business community that seem convinced, wrongly, they can keep making money in China without being sullied by its politics.

Hong Kong is not alone in being threatened by a Communist Party seeking to expand China’s presence on the world stage. Never has China been so aggressive on so many fronts: with Taiwan, in the South China Sea, at the Indian border and worldwide, through its influence networks and United Front operations. Mr. Xi’s repressive moves in Hong Kong are related to those other aggressions. And all of these are related to his need to justify to the Chinese Communist Party why he should be ruler for life.

Mr. Xi has a lot of justifying to do indeed. His “One Belt, One Road” initiative is sputtering, tainted by corruption and jeopardized by the growing risk that participating governments will default on loans they could never afford. Most of the free world is rejecting his 5G ruse, as Huawei, the Chinese tech giant, is increasingly perceived to be a security threat by other countries.

He has blundered by creating unprecedented tensions with America. His government’s delayed reaction to the spread of the coronavirus has translated into China’s worst economic performance since it opened up its market four decades ago. Animosity festers against China all over the world for the lives, jobs and wealth destroyed by the pandemic.

Faced with these failures, Mr. Xi wants to be able to claim that, at least, he has taken full control of Hong Kong for the Chinese Communist Party, after years of what many of the party’s senior members think was far too tolerant a treatment of our city.

As that treatment hardens, though, the resolve of the people of Hong Kong to fight for our rights and our freedoms will only strengthen.

And as we enter this new phase of our struggle, we need the support of the West, especially the United States.

On Wednesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that Hong Kong could no longer be considered to have significant autonomy from the mainland, a condition for maintaining the city’s special trade status with the United States. The White House is said to be weighing other reprisals.

These measures stem from the right impulse, but some of their consequences must be carefully considered.

I hope, for example, that the United States government does not completely lift Hong Kong’s privileged economic status. The city needs those special ties, so it can keep standing apart from the mainland and have at least some economic edge over it. Removing those privileges would only make Hong Kong more dependent on China. [Update: After publication, President Trump announced he would end Hong Kong’s special relationship with the United States.]

There are other ways to retaliate against China for its repression of Hong Kong: Revoking student visas for the children of both Chinese Communist Party and Hong Kong officials, and increasing scrutiny of party corruption abroad, for example. At the same time, granting rewards to Hong Kong people — including more immigration and visa privileges in the United States — would be an open rebuke to the Chinese government.

Fighting for Hong Kong isn’t just about saving Hong Kong or sending China a message. The longer the West supports Hong Kong while we, Hong Kongers, fight for the rule of law, for individual rights, for our freedoms — for freedom, period — the more the world will realize how distrust-worthy China is, how dangerous it is to peace in the world.

Making this truth apparent is not about starting a new Cold War with China. It is about bringing stability to the world so that the West can protect its own free way of life — and the rest of us can have a fighting chance at that, too.

Jimmy Lai is the founder and majority owner of Next Digital, which publishes the Apple Daily newspaper and Next Magazine in Hong Kong and Taiwan. @JimmyLaiApple

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Measure
Measure
Related Notes
Get a free MyMarkup account to save this article and view it later on any device.
Create account

End User License Agreement

Summary | 46 Annotations
Even sanctuaries of freedom from outside the city are now imperiled here
2020/06/03 05:52
When it comes to free speech
2020/06/03 06:00
It didn’t have to be this way.
2020/06/03 06:01
in a spectacular miscalculation
2020/06/03 06:02
ram through
2020/06/03 06:04
on the sly.
2020/06/03 06:04
saw through the move
2020/06/03 06:06
shattered the protections
2020/06/03 06:11
undergird the stability of the financial and business sectors
2020/06/03 06:11
obviating the need for anything like
2020/06/03 06:12
is engulfed in
2020/06/03 06:15
be tamed under
2020/06/03 06:24
undoing the city’s unique freedoms
2020/06/03 06:26
invokes process and procedures, laws and regulations
2020/06/03 06:28
charade,
2020/06/03 06:28
offering a few talking points
2020/06/03 06:29
a semblance of cover to compliant governments
2020/06/03 06:32
being sullied
2020/06/03 06:33
expand China’s presence
2020/06/03 06:34
are related to his need
2020/06/03 06:35
justify to
2020/06/03 06:35
for life
2020/06/03 06:35
initiative is sputterin
2020/06/03 06:37
tainted by corruption
2020/06/03 06:37
d
2020/06/03 06:38
default on loans
2020/06/03 06:38
perceived to be
2020/06/03 06:39
He has blundered by
2020/06/03 06:40
delayed reaction
2020/06/03 06:41
translated into
2020/06/03 06:41
Animosity festers against China all over the world for the lives
2020/06/03 06:42
he resolve of the people
2020/06/03 06:44
the resolve of the pe
2020/06/03 06:44
weighing other reprisals
2020/06/03 06:46
These measures stem from the right impulse, but some of their consequences must be carefully considered.
2020/06/03 06:46
tem from
2020/06/03 06:46
These measures stem from
2020/06/03 06:46
stem from
2020/06/03 06:47
lift Hong Kong’s privileged economic status
2020/06/03 06:47
have at least some economic edge over it
2020/06/03 06:48
have at least some economic edge over it
2020/06/03 06:48
retaliate against
2020/06/03 06:49
increasing scrutiny of
2020/06/03 06:51
open rebuke
2020/06/03 06:51
distrust-worthy
2020/06/03 06:53
have a fighting chance
2020/06/03 06:54