The website uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Privacy Policy.
I Agree
blank_error__heading
blank_error__body
Text direction?

Robinhood Financial Hit With Class-Action Suit for Selling Stock Orders

U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    3,703.06
    +13.05 (+0.35%)
  • Dow 30

    30,199.87
    +70.04 (+0.23%)
  • Nasdaq

    12,804.73
    +33.62 (+0.26%)
  • Russell 2000

    2,003.95
    -3.15 (-0.16%)
  • Crude Oil

    48.23
    0.00 (0.00%)
  • Gold

    1,883.20
    0.00 (0.00%)
  • Silver

    25.91
    0.00 (0.00%)
  • EUR/USD

    1.2217
    +0.0019 (+0.16%)
  • 10-Yr Bond

    0.9260
    -0.0290 (-3.04%)
  • GBP/USD

    1.3544
    -0.0026 (-0.19%)
  • USD/JPY

    103.6700
    +0.0980 (+0.09%)
  • BTC-USD

    27,612.91
    +1.12 (+0.00%)
  • CMC Crypto 200

    457.76
    +31.22 (+7.32%)
  • FTSE 100

    6,502.11
    +6.36 (+0.10%)
  • Nikkei 225

    26,656.61
    -11.74 (-0.04%)

Robinhood Financial Hit With Class-Action Suit for Selling Stock Orders

Peter Blumberg
·1 min read

(Bloomberg) -- Robinhood Financial LLC was sued in a proposed class action for allegedly failing to inform clients it was selling their stock orders to trading firms and effectively charging back-door commission fees.

The complaint filed Wednesday in San Francisco federal court follows the company’s $65 million settlement last week with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over similar allegations.

While Robinhood touted “commission free” trading on its platform, it didn’t disclose that it relied extensively on “payment for order flow,” collecting payment from market makers in exchange for executing trades, according to the suit.

“The principal trading firms/electronic market makers in turn passed these costs along to Robinhood’s clients on each trade through inferior execution quality -- the price at which the requested market orders were executed,” according to the complaint.

Read More: Robinhood Pays $65 Million to End a Key Probe, But Others Fester

As part of the accord with the SEC, Robinhood agreed to have an outside consultant monitor its compliance by ensuring it follows rules requiring firms to provide best execution for trades. Robinhood, which didn’t admit or deny the regulator’s claims, said at the time it is now fully transparent in its communications with customers about how it makes money.

Nora Chan, a Robinhood spokeswoman, declined to comment.

The case is Lemon v. Robinhood Financial LLC, 20-cv-09328, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

(Updates with Robinhood declining to comment)

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com

Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.

©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

Measure
Measure
Related Notes
Get a free MyMarkup account to save this article and view it later on any device.
Create account

End User License Agreement

Summary | 4 Annotations
Robinhood Financial LLC was sued in a proposed class action for allegedly failing to inform clients it was selling their stock orders to trading firms and effectively charging back-door commission fees.
2020/12/24 15:00
While Robinhood touted “commission free” trading on its platform, it didn’t disclose that it relied extensively on “payment for order flow,” collecting payment from market makers in exchange for executing trades, according to the suit.
2020/12/24 15:00
“The principal trading firms/electronic market makers in turn passed these costs along to Robinhood’s clients on each trade through inferior execution quality -- the price at which the requested market orders were executed,” according to the complaint.
2020/12/24 15:00
As part of the accord with the SEC, Robinhood agreed to have an outside consultant monitor its compliance by ensuring it follows rules requiring firms to provide best execution for trades. Robinhood, which didn’t admit or deny the regulator’s claims, said at the time it is now fully transparent in its communications with customers about how it makes money.
2020/12/24 15:00