Neurofibromin 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
PBB Protein NF1 image.jpg
Available structures
PDB Ortholog search: PDBe RCSB
Aliases NF1, NFNS, VRNF, WSS, neurofibromin 1
External IDs OMIM: 613113 MGI: 97306 HomoloGene: 141252 GeneCards: NF1
Gene location (Human)
Chromosome 17 (human)
Chr. Chromosome 17 (human)[1]
Chromosome 17 (human)
Genomic location for NF1
Genomic location for NF1
Band 17q11.2 Start 31,094,927 bp[1]
End 31,382,116 bp[1]
Species Human Mouse
RefSeq (mRNA)



RefSeq (protein)



Location (UCSC) Chr 17: 31.09 – 31.38 Mb Chr 11: 79.34 – 79.58 Mb
PubMed search [3] [4]
View/Edit Human View/Edit Mouse

Neurofibromin 1 (NF1) is a gene in humans that is located on chromosome 17.[5][6][7] NF1 codes for neurofibromin, a GTPase-activating protein that negatively regulates RAS/MAPK pathway activity by accelerating the hydrolysis of Ras-bound GTP.[5][6][8] NF1 has a high mutation rate and mutations in NF1 can alter cellular growth control, and neural development, resulting in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1, also known as von Recklinghausen syndrome).[5][6] Symptoms of NF1 include disfiguring cutaneous neurofibromas (CNF), café au lait pigment spots, plexiform neurofibromas (PN), skeletal defects, optic nerve gliomas, life-threatening malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST), attention deficits, learning deficits and other cognitive disabilities.[5][6][9]


NF1 was cloned in 1990[10][11] and its gene product neurofibromin was identified in 1992.[12][13][14][15] Neurofibromin, a GTPase-activating protein, primarily regulates the protein Ras.[16] NF1 is located on the long arm of chromosome 17, position q11.2[6] NF1 spans over 350-kb of genomic DNA and contains 62 exons.[7] 58 of these exons are constitutive and 4 exhibit alternative splicing ( 9a, 10a-2, 23a, and 28a).[7] The genomic sequence starts 4,951-bp upstream of the transcription start site and 5,334-bp upstream of the translation initiation codon, with the length of the 5’ UTR being 484-bp long.[17]

There are three genes that are present within intron 27b of NF1. These genes are EVI2B, EVI2A and OMG, which are encoded on the opposite strand and are transcribed in the opposite direction of NF1.[17] EVI2A and EVI2B are human homologs of the Evi-2A and Evi-2B genes in mice that encode proteins related to leukemia in mice.[18] OMG is a membrane glycoprotein that is expressed in the human central nervous system during myelination of nerve cells.[17]


Early studies of the NF1 promoter found that there is great homology between the human and mouse NF1 promoters.[17] The major transcription start site has been confirmed, as well as two minor transcription start sites in both the human and mouse gene.[17]

The major transcription start is 484-bp upstream of the translation initiation site.[19] The open reading frame is 8,520-bp long and begins at the translation initiation site.[19] NF1 exon 1 is 544-bp long, contains the 5’ UTR and encodes the first 20 amino acids of neurofibromin.[17] The NF1 promoter lies within a CpG island that is 472-bp long, consisting of 43 CpG dinucleotides, and extends into the start of exon 1.[17][19] This CpG Island begins 731-bp upstream of the promoter and no core promoter element, such as a TATA or CCATT box, has been found within it.[19] Although no core promoter element has been found, consensus binding sequences have been identified in the 5’ UTR for several transcription factors such as Sp1 and AP2.[17]

A methylation map of five regions of the promoter in both mouse and human was published in 1999. This map showed that three of the regions (at approximately – 1000, – 3000, and – 4000) were frequently methylated, but the cytosines near the transcription start site were unmethylated.[17]  Methylation has been shown to functionally impact Sp1 sites as well as a CREB binding site.[20] It has been shown that the CREB site must be intact for normal promoter activity to occur and methylation at the Sp1 sites may affect promoter activity.[20]

Proximal NF1 promoter/5’ UTR methylation has been analyzed in tissues from NF1 patients, with the idea that reduced transcription as a result of methylation could be a “second hit” mechanism equivalent to a somatic mutation.[17] There are some sites that have been detected to be methylated at a higher frequency in tumor tissues than normal tissues.[17] These sites are mostly within the proximal promoter; however, some are in the 5’ UTR as well and there is a lot of interindividual variability in the cytosine methylation in these regions.[17]

3' UTR[edit]

A study in 1993 compared the mouse NF1 cDNA to the human transcript and found that both the untranslated regions and coding regions were highly conserved.[17] It was verified that there are two NF1 polyadenylated transcripts that differ in size because of the length of the 3’ UTR, which is consistent with what has been found in the mouse gene.[17]

A study conducted in 2000 examined whether the involvement of the 3’ UTR in post-transcriptional gene regulation had an effect on the variation of NF1 transcript quantity both spatially and temporally.[17] Five regions of the 3’ UTR that appear to bind proteins were found, one of which is HuR, a tumor antigen.[21] HuR binds to AU-rich elements which are scattered throughout the 3' UTR and are thought to be negative regulators of transcript stability.[21] This supports the idea that post-transcriptional mechanisms may influence the levels of NF1 transcript.[21]


NF1 has one of the highest mutation rates amongst known human genes,[22] however mutation detection is difficult because of its large size, the presence of pseudogenes, and the variety of possible mutations.[23] The NF1 locus has a high incidence of de novo mutations, meaning that the mutations are not inherited maternally or paternally.[18] Although the mutation rate is high, there are no mutation “hot spot” regions. Mutations tend to be distributed within the gene, although exons 3, 5, and 27 are common sites for mutations.[18]

The Human Gene Mutation Database contains 1,347 NF1 mutations, but none are in the “regulatory” category.[17] There have not been any mutations conclusively identified within the promoter or untranslated regions. This may be because such mutations are rare, or they do not result in a recognizable phenotype.[17]

There have been mutations identified that affect splicing, in fact 286 of the known mutations are identified as splicing mutations.[22] About 78% of splicing mutations directly affect splice sites, which can cause aberrant splicing to occur.[22] Aberrant splicing may also occur due to mutations within a splicing regulatory element. Intronic mutations that fall outside of splice sites also fall under splicing mutations, and approximately 5% of splicing mutations are of this nature.[22] Point mutations that effect splicing are commonly seen and these are often substitutions in the regulatory sequence. Exonic mutations can lead to deletion of an entire exon, or a fragment of an exon if the mutation creates a new splice site.[18] Intronic mutations can result in the insertion of a cryptic exon, or result in exon skipping if the mutation is in the conserved 3’ or 5’ end.[18]


NF1 encodes neurofibromin (NF1), which is a 320-kDa protein that contains 2,818 amino acids.[5][6][7] Neurofibromin is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) that negatively regulates Ras pathway activity by accelerating hydrolysis of Ras-bound guanosine triphosphate (GTP).[8][16] Neurofibromin localizes in the cytoplasm; however, some studies have found neurofibromin or fragments of it in the nucleus.[8] Neurofibromin does contain a nuclear localization signal that is encoded by exon 43, but whether or not neurofibromin plays a role in the nucleus is currently unknown.[7] Neurofibromin is ubiquitously expressed, but expression levels vary depending on the tissue type and developmental stage of the organism.[5][6] Expression is at its highest level in adult neurons, Schwann cells, astrocytes, leukocytes, and oligodendrocytes.[7][8]

The catalytic RasGAP activity of neurofibromin is located in a central portion of the protein, that is called the GAP-related domain (GRD).[8] The GRD is closely homologous to RasGAP[8] and represents about 10% (229 amino acids[8]) of the neurofibromin sequence.[6] The GRD is made up of a central portion called the minimal central catalytic domain (GAPc) as well as an extra domain (GAPex) that is formed through the coiling of about 50 residues from the N- and C- terminus.[8] The Ras-binding region is found in the surface of GAPc and consists of a shallow pocket that is lined by conserved amino acid residues.[8]

In addition to the GRD, neurofibromin also contains a Sec14 homology-like region as well as a pleckstrin homology-like (PH) domain.[8] Sec14 domains are defined by a lipid binding pocket that resembles a cage and is covered by a helical lid portion that is believed to regulate ligand access.[8] The PH-like region displays a protrusion that connects two beta-strands from the PH core that extend to interact with the helical lid found in the Sec14 domain.[8] The function of the interaction between these two regions is presently unclear, but the structure implies a regulatory interaction that influences the helical-lid conformation in order to control ligand access to the lipid binding pocket.[8]


Through its NF1-GRD domain, neurofibromin increases the rate of GTP hydrolysis of Ras, and acts as a tumor suppressor by reducing Ras activity.[5][7] When the Ras-Nf1 complex assembles, active Ras binds in a groove that is present in the neurofibromin catalytic domain.[7] This binding occurs through Ras switch regions I and II, and an arginine finger present in neurofibromin.[7] The interaction between Ras and neurofibromin causes GAP-stimulated hydrolysis of GTP to GDP.[7] This process depends on the stabilization of residues in the Ras switch I and switch II regions, which drives Ras into the confirmation required for enzymatic function.[7] This interaction between Ras and neurofibromin also requires the transition state of GDP hydrolysis to be stabilized, which is performed through the insertion of the positively charged arginine finger into the Ras active site.[7] This neutralizes the negative charges that are present on GTP during phosphoryl transfer.[7] By hydrolyzing GTP to GDP, neurofibromin inactivates Ras and therefore negatively regulates the Ras pathway, which controls the expression of genes involved in apoptosis, the cell cycle, cell differentiation or migration.[7]

Neurofibromin is also known to interact with CASK through syndecan, a protein which is involved in the KIF17/ABPA1/CASK/LIN7A complex, which is involved in trafficking GRIN2B to the synapse. This suggests that neurofibromin has a role in the transportation of the NMDA receptor subunits to the synapse and its membrane. Neurofibromin is also believed to be involved in the synaptic ATP-PKA-cAMP pathway, through modulation of adenylyl cyclase. It is also known to bind the caveolin 1, a protein which regulates p21ras, PKC and growth response factors.[7]


There are currently five known isoforms of neurofibromin (II, 3, 4, 9a, and 10a-2) and these isoforms are generated through the inclusion of alternative splicing exons (9a, 10a-2, 23a, and 48a) that do not alter the reading frame.[7] These five isoforms are expressed in distinct tissues and are each detected by specific antibodies.[7]

  • Neurofibromin type II, also named GRD2 (domain II-related GAP), results from the insertion of exon 23a, which causes the addition of 21 amino acids in the 5’ region of the protein. Neurofibromin type II is expressed in Schwann cells and has reduced GAP activity.[7]
  • Neurofibromin type 3 (also called isoform 3’ ALT) contains exon 48a which results in the insertion of 18 amino acids into the 3’ terminal.[7]
  • Neurofibromin type 4 contains exons 23a and 48a, which results in the insertion of 21 amino acids in the 5’ region, and 18 amino acids in the 3’ terminal.[7]
  • Neurofibromin 9a (also referred to as 9br), includes exon 9a which results in the insertion of 10 amino acids in the 5’ region. This isoform shows little neuronal expression and may play a role in memory and learning mechanisms.[7]
  • An isoform with insertion of exon 10a-2 has been studied introduces a transmembrane domain.[24] The inclusion of exon 10a-2 causes the insertion of 15 amino acids in the 5’ region. This isoform is expressed in most human tissues, therefore it likely performs a housekeeping function in intracellular membranes.[7]

It has been suggested that the quantitative differences in expression between the different isoforms may be related to the phenotypic variability of neurofibromatosis type 1 patients.[7]

RNA editing[edit]

In the NF1 mRNA, there is a site within the first half of the GRD where mRNA editing occurs.[25] Deamination occurs at this site, resulting in the conversion of cytidine into uridine at nucleotide 3916.[25][26] This deamination changes an arginine codon (CGA) to an in-frame translation stop codon (UGA).[26] If the edited transcript is translated, it produces a protein that cannot function as a tumor suppressor because the N-terminal of the GRD is truncated.[25] The editing site in NF1 mRNA was shown to have high homology to the ApoB editing site, where double stranded mRNA undergoes editing by the ApoB holoenzyme.[26] NF1 mRNA editing was believed to involve the ApoB holoenzyme due to the high homology between the two editing sites, however studies have shown that this is not the case.[25] The editing site in NF1 is longer than the sequence required for ApoB mediated mRNA editing, and the region contains two guanidines which are not present in the ApoB editing site.[26]

Clinical significance[edit]

Mutations in NF1 are primarily associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1, also known as von Recklinghausen syndrome).[5][6] NF1 is the most common single gene disorder in humans, occurring in about 1 in 2500-3000 births worldwide.[27] NF1 is an autosomal dominant disorder, but approximately half of NF1 cases arise from de novo mutations. NF1 has high phenotypic variability, with members of the same family with the same mutation displaying different symptoms and symptom intensities.[28][29] Café-au-lait spots are the most common sign of NF1, but other symptoms include lisch nodules of iris, cutaneous neurofibromas (CNF), plexiform neurofibromas (PN), skeletal defects, optic nerve gliomas, life-threatening malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST), attention deficits, learning deficits and other cognitive disabilities.[5][6][9]

In addition to neurofibromatosis type I, mutations in NF1 can also lead to juvenile myelomonocytic leukemias (JMML), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), Watson syndrome, astrocytic neoplasms, phaeochromocytomas and breast cancer.[5]

No effective therapy NF1 yet exists. Instead, people with neurofibromatosis are followed by a team of specialists to manage symptoms or complications.[5][30]

Model organisms[edit]

A lot about of our knowledge on the biology of NF1 came from model organisms including the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster,[31] the zebrafish Danio rerio[32] and the mouse Mus musculus,[33] which all contain an NF1 ortholog in their genome (no NF1 ortholog exists in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.[5]) Research based on these preclinical models has already proven its efficacy as multiple clinical assays have been initiated subsequently regarding neurofibromatosis type 1-related plexiform neurofibromas, gliomas, MPNST and neurocognitive disorders.[5]

Mouse models[edit]

In 1994, the first NF1 genetically engineered knockout mice were published:[34][35] homozygosity for the Nf1 mutation (Nf1-/-) induced severe developmental cardiac abnormalities that led to embryonic lethality at early stages of the development,[34] pointing out that NF1 plays a fundamental role in normal development. On the contrary, Nf1 heterozygous animals (Nf1+/-) were viable but predisposed to form different types of tumors.[35] In some of these tumor cells, genetic events of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) were observed, supporting that NF1 functions as a tumor suppressor gene.[35]

A conditional knockout mouse line, called Nf1tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi[36][37] was later generated as part of the International Knockout Mouse Consortium program, a high-throughput mutagenesis project to generate and distribute animal models of disease to interested scientists.[38][39][40] Male and female animals underwent a standardized phenotypic screen to determine the effects of deletion.[41][42] Twenty six tests were carried out on mutant mice and four significant abnormalities were observed.[41] Over half the homozygous mutant embryos identified during gestation were dead, and in a separate study none survived until weaning. The remaining tests were carried out on heterozygous mutant adult mice: females displayed abnormal hair cycling while males had an decreased B cell number and an increased monocyte cell number.[41]

The development of several other NF1 mouse models[48] has also allowed the implementation of preclinical research to test the therapeutic potential of targeted pharmacologic agents, such as sorafenib[49] (VEGFR, PDGFR & RAF kinases inhibitor) and everolimus[49] (mTORC inhibitor) for the treatment of NF1 plexiform neurofibromas, sirolimus (rapamycin)[50] (mTORC inhibitor) for MPNSTs, or lovastatin[51] (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor), and alectinib[52] (ALK inhibitor) for NF1 cognitive and learning disabilities.

In 2013, two conditional knockout mouse models, called Dhh-Cre;Nf1flox/flox[53] (which develops neurofibromas similar to those found in NF1 patients) and Mx1-Cre;Nf1flox/flox[54] (which develops myeloproliferative neoplasms similar to those found in NF1 juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia/JMML) were used to study the effects of the specific MEK inhibitor PD032590 on tumor progression.[53][54] The inhibitor demonstrated a remarkable response in tumor regression and in hematologic improvement.[53][54] Based on these results, phase I[55] and later phase II[56][57] clinical trials were then conducted in children with inoperable NF1-related plexiform neurofibromas, using Selumetinib,[58] an oral selective MEK inhibitor used previously in several advanced adult neoplasms. The children enrolled in the study[59] benefited from the treatment without suffering from excessive toxic effects,[55] and treatment induced partial responses in 72% of them.[56] These unprecedented and promising results from the phase II SPRINT trial,[56][57] led, first in 2018, both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency to grant Selumetinib an Orphan Drug Status for the treatment of neurofibromatosis type 1, and then, a few months later in 2019, FDA to grant a Breakthrough Therapy Designation to the inhibitor.[60]

Drosophila melanogaster[edit]

The Drosophila melanogaster ortholog gene[31] of human NF1 (dNF1) has been identified and cloned in 1997.[61] The gene is slightly more compact than its human counterpart but still remains one of the largest genes of the fly genome. It encodes a protein 55% identical and 69% similar to human neurofibromin over its entire 2,802 amino acid length.[61] It comprises an IRA-related central segment containing the catalytic GAP-related domain (GRD), which are both highly similar to their human counterparts. Also, other conserved regions exist both up- and downstream of this domain.[31][61]

dNF1, like its human counterpart, is mainly expressed in the developing and adult nervous system[62][63] and primarily controls the MAPK RAS/ERK signaling pathway.[31]

Through the use of several mutant null alleles of dNF1 that have been generated,[61][62] its role has been progressively elucidated. dNF1 functions to regulate organism growth and whole-body size,[61][62][63][64] synaptic growth,[64] neuromuscular junction function,[65][66] circadian clock and rhythmic behaviors,[67] mitochondrial function,[68] and associative learning and long-term memory.[69][70][71][63] Large scale genetic and functional screens have also led to the identification of dominant modifier genes responsible for the dNF1-associated defects.[64]

Interestingly, whole-body size deficits, learning defects and aberrant RAS/ERK signaling are also key features of the NF1 condition in humans,[5][31] and are all due to a deregulation of the Anaplastic lymphoma Kinase ALK-NF1-RAS/ERK signaling pathway in flies.[63][64] Pharmacological treatment using a highly-specific ALK inhibitor corrected all these defects in flies[63] and this therapeutic approach was later successfully validated in a preclinical mouse model of NF1[72][52] by treating mice with Alectinib, suggesting it represents a promising therapeutic target.[30]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c GRCh38: Ensembl release 89: ENSG00000196712 - Ensembl, May 2017
  2. ^ a b c GRCm38: Ensembl release 89: ENSMUSG00000020716 - Ensembl, May 2017
  3. ^ "Human PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  4. ^ "Mouse PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Upadhyaya M, Cooper DN, eds. (2012). Neurofibromatosis type 1: molecular and cellular biology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32864-0. ISBN 9783642328633.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Peltonen S, Kallionpää RA, Peltonen J (July 2017). "Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene: Beyond café au lait spots and dermal neurofibromas". Experimental Dermatology. 26 (7): 645–648. doi:10.1111/exd.13212. PMID 27622733.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w Trovó-Marqui AB, Tajara EH (July 2006). "Neurofibromin: a general outlook". Clinical Genetics. 70 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00639.x. PMID 16813595.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Scheffzek K, Welti S (2012). "Neurofibromin: Protein Domains and Functional Characteristics". In Upadhyaya M, Cooper D (eds.). Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 305–326. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32864-0_20. ISBN 978-3-642-32864-0.
  9. ^ a b Peltonen S, Pöyhönen M (2012). "Clinical Diagnosis and Atypical Forms of NF1". In Upadhyaya M, Cooper D (eds.). Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 17–30. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32864-0_2. ISBN 978-3-642-32864-0.
  10. ^ Viskochil D, Buchberg AM, Xu G, Cawthon RM, Stevens J, Wolff RK, et al. (July 1990). "Deletions and a translocation interrupt a cloned gene at the neurofibromatosis type 1 locus". Cell. 62 (1): 187–92. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90252-a. PMID 1694727.
  11. ^ Wallace MR, Marchuk DA, Andersen LB, Letcher R, Odeh HM, Saulino AM, et al. (July 1990). "Type 1 neurofibromatosis gene: identification of a large transcript disrupted in three NF1 patients". Science. 249 (4965): 181–6. Bibcode:1990Sci...249..181W. doi:10.1126/science.2134734. PMID 2134734.
  12. ^ Daston MM, Scrable H, Nordlund M, Sturbaum AK, Nissen LM, Ratner N (March 1992). "The protein product of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene is expressed at highest abundance in neurons, Schwann cells, and oligodendrocytes". Neuron. 8 (3): 415–28. doi:10.1016/0896-6273(92)90270-n. PMID 1550670.
  13. ^ Hattori S, Maekawa M, Nakamura S (March 1992). "Identification of neurofibromatosis type I gene product as an insoluble GTPase-activating protein toward ras p21". Oncogene. 7 (3): 481–5. PMID 1549362.
  14. ^ DeClue JE, Papageorge AG, Fletcher JA, Diehl SR, Ratner N, Vass WC, Lowy DR (April 1992). "Abnormal regulation of mammalian p21ras contributes to malignant tumor growth in von Recklinghausen (type 1) neurofibromatosis". Cell. 69 (2): 265–73. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90407-4. PMID 1568246.
  15. ^ Daston MM, Ratner N (November 1992). "Neurofibromin, a predominantly neuronal GTPase activating protein in the adult, is ubiquitously expressed during development". Developmental Dynamics. 195 (3): 216–26. doi:10.1002/aja.1001950307. PMID 1301085.
  16. ^ a b Xu GF, O'Connell P, Viskochil D, Cawthon R, Robertson M, Culver M, et al. (August 1990). "The neurofibromatosis type 1 gene encodes a protein related to GAP". Cell. 62 (3): 599–608. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90024-9. PMID 2116237.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Li H, Wallace MR (2012). "NF1 Gene: Promoter, 5′ UTR, and 3′ UTR.". In Upadhyaya M, Cooper D (eds.). Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 105–113. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32864-0_9. ISBN 978-3-642-32864-0.
  18. ^ a b c d e Abramowicz A, Gos M (July 2014). "Neurofibromin in neurofibromatosis type 1 - mutations in NF1gene as a cause of disease". Developmental Period Medicine. 18 (3): 297–306. PMID 25182393.
  19. ^ a b c d Lee TK, Friedman JM (August 2005). "Analysis of NF1 transcriptional regulatory elements". American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A. 137 (2): 130–5. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30699. PMID 16059932.
  20. ^ a b Zou MX, Butcher DT, Sadikovic B, Groves TC, Yee SP, Rodenhiser DI (January 2004). "Characterization of functional elements in the neurofibromatosis (NF1) proximal promoter region". Oncogene. 23 (2): 330–9. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207053. PMID 14647436.
  21. ^ a b c Haeussler J, Haeusler J, Striebel AM, Assum G, Vogel W, Furneaux H, Krone W (January 2000). "Tumor antigen HuR binds specifically to one of five protein-binding segments in the 3'-untranslated region of the neurofibromin messenger RNA". Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 267 (3): 726–32. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1999.2019. PMID 10673359.
  22. ^ a b c d Baralle M, Baralle D (2012). "Splicing Mechanisms and Mutations in the NF1 Gene.". In Upadhyaya M, Cooper D (eds.). Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 135–150. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32864-0_11. ISBN 978-3-642-32864-0.
  23. ^ Pasmant E, Vidaud D (May 2016). "Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Molecular Diagnosis: The RNA Point of View". EBioMedicine. 7: 21–2. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.036. PMC 4909605. PMID 27322453.
  24. ^ Kaufmann D, Müller R, Kenner O, Leistner W, Hein C, Vogel W, Bartelt B (June 2002). "The N-terminal splice product NF1-10a-2 of the NF1 gene codes for a transmembrane segment". Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 294 (2): 496–503. doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00501-6. PMID 12051738.
  25. ^ a b c d Cappione AJ, French BL, Skuse GR (February 1997). "A potential role for NF1 mRNA editing in the pathogenesis of NF1 tumors". American Journal of Human Genetics. 60 (2): 305–12. PMC 1712412. PMID 9012403.
  26. ^ a b c d Skuse GR, Cappione AJ, Sowden M, Metheny LJ, Smith HC (February 1996). "The neurofibromatosis type I messenger RNA undergoes base-modification RNA editing". Nucleic Acids Research. 24 (3): 478–85. doi:10.1093/nar/24.3.478. PMC 145654. PMID 8602361.
  27. ^ Woodrow C, Clarke A, Amirfeyz R (2015). "Neurofibromatosis". Orthopaedics and Trauma. 29 (3): 206–210. doi:10.1016/j.mporth.2015.02.004.
  28. ^ Williams VC, Lucas J, Babcock MA, Gutmann DH, Korf B, Maria BL (January 2009). "Neurofibromatosis type 1 revisited". Pediatrics. 123 (1): 124–33. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3204. PMID 19117870.
  29. ^ Ward BA, Gutmann DH (April 2005). "Neurofibromatosis 1: from lab bench to clinic". Pediatric Neurology. 32 (4): 221–8. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.11.002. PMID 15797177.
  30. ^ a b Walker JA, Upadhyaya M (May 2018). "Emerging therapeutic targets for neurofibromatosis type 1". Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets. 22 (5): 419–437. doi:10.1080/14728222.2018.1465931. PMID 29667529.
  31. ^ a b c d e Walker JA, Gouzi JY, Bernards A (2012). "Drosophila: An Invertebrate Model of NF1. (Chapter 34)". In Upadhyaya M, Cooper D (eds.). Neurofibromatosis Type 1: molecular and cellular biology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 523–534. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32864-0_34. ISBN 978-3-642-32863-3.
  32. ^ Padmanabhan A, Epstein JA (2012). "Zebrafish Model for NF1. (Chapter 35)". In Upadhyaya M, Cooper D (eds.). Neurofibromatosis Type 1: molecular and cellular Biology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 535–547. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32864-0_35. ISBN 978-3-642-32863-3.
  33. ^ Maertens O, Cichowski K (2012). "Advances in NF1 Animal Models and Lessons Learned. (Chapter 33)". In Upadhyaya M, Cooper D (eds.). Neurofibromatosis Type 1: molecular and cellular Biology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 513–521. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32864-0_33. ISBN 978-3-642-32863-3.
  34. ^ a b Brannan CI, Perkins AS, Vogel KS, Ratner N, Nordlund ML, Reid SW, et al. (May 1994). "Targeted disruption of the neurofibromatosis type-1 gene leads to developmental abnormalities in heart and various neural crest-derived tissues". Genes & Development. 8 (9): 1019–29. doi:10.1101/gad.8.9.1019. PMID 7926784.
  35. ^ a b c Jacks T, Shih TS, Schmitt EM, Bronson RT, Bernards A, Weinberg RA (July 1994). "Tumour predisposition in mice heterozygous for a targeted mutation in Nf1". Nature Genetics. 7 (3): 353–61. doi:10.1038/ng0794-353. PMID 7920653.
  36. ^ "International Knockout Mouse Consortium".
  37. ^ "Mouse Genome Informatics".
  38. ^ Skarnes WC, Rosen B, West AP, Koutsourakis M, Bushell W, Iyer V, et al. (June 2011). "A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function". Nature. 474 (7351): 337–42. doi:10.1038/nature10163. PMC 3572410. PMID 21677750.
  39. ^ Dolgin E (June 2011). "Mouse library set to be knockout". Nature. 474 (7351): 262–3. doi:10.1038/474262a. PMID 21677718.
  40. ^ Collins FS, Rossant J, Wurst W (January 2007). "A mouse for all reasons". Cell. 128 (1): 9–13. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.018. PMID 17218247.
  41. ^ a b c d Gerdin AK (2010). "The Sanger Mouse Genetics Programme: High throughput characterisation of knockout mice". Acta Ophthalmologica. 88 (S248): 0. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.4142.x.
  42. ^ van der Weyden L, White JK, Adams DJ, Logan DW (June 2011). "The mouse genetics toolkit: revealing function and mechanism". Genome Biology. 12 (6): 224. doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-224. PMC 3218837. PMID 21722353.
  43. ^ "Dysmorphology data for Nf1". Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  44. ^ "Peripheral blood lymphocytes data for Nf1". Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  45. ^ "Salmonella infection data for Nf1". Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  46. ^ "Citrobacter infection data for Nf1". Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  47. ^ Mouse Resources Portal, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
  48. ^ Maertens O, McCurrach ME, Braun BS, De Raedt T, Epstein I, Huang TQ, et al. (November 2017). "A Collaborative Model for Accelerating the Discovery and Translation of Cancer Therapies". Cancer Research. 77 (21): 5706–5711. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1789. PMC 5668167. PMID 28993414.
  49. ^ a b Wu J, Dombi E, Jousma E, Scott Dunn R, Lindquist D, Schnell BM, et al. (February 2012). "Preclincial testing of sorafenib and RAD001 in the Nf(flox/flox) ;DhhCre mouse model of plexiform neurofibroma using magnetic resonance imaging". Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 58 (2): 173–80. doi:10.1002/pbc.23015. PMC 3128176. PMID 21319287.
  50. ^ Johannessen CM, Johnson BW, Williams SM, Chan AW, Reczek EE, Lynch RC, et al. (January 2008). "TORC1 is essential for NF1-associated malignancies". Current Biology. 18 (1): 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.066. PMID 18164202.
  51. ^ Li W, Cui Y, Kushner SA, Brown RA, Jentsch JD, Frankland PW, et al. (November 2005). "The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin reverses the learning and attention deficits in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1". Current Biology. 15 (21): 1961–7. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.043. PMID 16271875.
  52. ^ a b Weiss JB, Weber S, Marzulla T, Raber J (August 2017). "Pharmacological inhibition of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase rescues spatial memory impairments in Neurofibromatosis 1 mutant mice". Behavioural Brain Research. 332: 337–342. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.06.024. PMID 28629962.
  53. ^ a b c Jessen WJ, Miller SJ, Jousma E, Wu J, Rizvi TA, Brundage ME, et al. (January 2013). "MEK inhibition exhibits efficacy in human and mouse neurofibromatosis tumors". The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 123 (1): 340–7. doi:10.1172/JCI60578. PMC 3533264. PMID 23221341.
  54. ^ a b c Chang T, Krisman K, Theobald EH, Xu J, Akutagawa J, Lauchle JO, et al. (January 2013). "Sustained MEK inhibition abrogates myeloproliferative disease in Nf1 mutant mice". The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 123 (1): 335–9. doi:10.1172/JCI63193. PMC 3533281. PMID 23221337.
  55. ^ a b Dombi E, Baldwin A, Marcus LJ, Fisher MJ, Weiss B, Kim A, et al. (December 2016). "Activity of Selumetinib in Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas". The New England Journal of Medicine. 375 (26): 2550–2560. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1605943. PMC 5508592. PMID 28029918.
  56. ^ a b c Gross AM, Wolters P, Baldwin A, Dombi E, Fisher MJ, Weiss BD, Kim A, Blakeley JO, Whitcomb P, Holmblad M, Martin S, Roderick MC, Paul SM, Therrien J, Heisey K, Doyle A, Malcolm A, Smith MA, Glod J, Steinberg SM, Widemann BC (May 2018). "SPRINT: Phase II study of the MEK 1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas (PN)". Journal of Clinical Oncology. 36 (no. 15_suppl): 10503. doi:10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.10503.
  57. ^ a b Identifier: NCT01362803
  58. ^ (AZD6244, co-developed by AstraZeneca and MSD, also known as Merck & Co. inside the US and Canada)
  59. ^ aged 2 to 18 years old
  60. ^ "Selumetinib granted US Breakthrough Therapy Designation in neurofibromatosis type 1" (Press release). AstraZeneca and Merck & Co. 1 April 2019. Retrieved 1 April 2019.
  61. ^ a b c d e The I, Hannigan GE, Cowley GS, Reginald S, Zhong Y, Gusella JF, et al. (May 1997). "Rescue of a Drosophila NF1 mutant phenotype by protein kinase A". Science. 276 (5313): 791–4. doi:10.1126/science.276.5313.791. PMID 9115203.
  62. ^ a b c Walker JA, Tchoudakova AV, McKenney PT, Brill S, Wu D, Cowley GS, et al. (December 2006). "Reduced growth of Drosophila neurofibromatosis 1 mutants reflects a non-cell-autonomous requirement for GTPase-Activating Protein activity in larval neurons". Genes & Development. 20 (23): 3311–23. doi:10.1101/gad.1466806. PMC 1686607. PMID 17114577.
  63. ^ a b c d e Gouzi JY, Moressis A, Walker JA, Apostolopoulou AA, Palmer RH, Bernards A, Skoulakis EM (September 2011). "The receptor tyrosine kinase Alk controls neurofibromin functions in Drosophila growth and learning". PLoS Genetics. 7 (9): e1002281. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002281. PMC 3174217. PMID 21949657.
  64. ^ a b c d Walker JA, Gouzi JY, Long JB, Huang S, Maher RC, Xia H, et al. (November 2013). "Genetic and functional studies implicate synaptic overgrowth and ring gland cAMP/PKA signaling defects in the Drosophila melanogaster neurofibromatosis-1 growth deficiency". PLoS Genetics. 9 (11): e1003958. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003958. PMC 3836801. PMID 24278035.
  65. ^ Zhong Y (June 1995). "Mediation of PACAP-like neuropeptide transmission by coactivation of Ras/Raf and cAMP signal transduction pathways in Drosophila". Nature. 375 (6532): 588–92. Bibcode:1995Natur.375..588Z. doi:10.1038/375588a0. PMID 7791875.
  66. ^ Guo HF, The I, Hannan F, Bernards A, Zhong Y (May 1997). "Requirement of Drosophila NF1 for activation of adenylyl cyclase by PACAP38-like neuropeptides". Science. 276 (5313): 795–8. doi:10.1126/science.276.5313.795. PMID 9115204.
  67. ^ Williams JA, Su HS, Bernards A, Field J, Sehgal A (September 2001). "A circadian output in Drosophila mediated by neurofibromatosis-1 and Ras/MAPK". Science. 293 (5538): 2251–6. Bibcode:2001Sci...293.2251W. doi:10.1126/science.1063097. PMID 11567138.
  68. ^ Tong JJ, Schriner SE, McCleary D, Day BJ, Wallace DC (April 2007). "Life extension through neurofibromin mitochondrial regulation and antioxidant therapy for neurofibromatosis-1 in Drosophila melanogaster". Nature Genetics. 39 (4): 476–85. doi:10.1038/ng2004. PMID 17369827.
  69. ^ Guo HF, Tong J, Hannan F, Luo L, Zhong Y (February 2000). "A neurofibromatosis-1-regulated pathway is required for learning in Drosophila". Nature. 403 (6772): 895–8. Bibcode:2000Natur.403..895G. doi:10.1038/35002593. PMID 10706287.
  70. ^ Ho IS, Hannan F, Guo HF, Hakker I, Zhong Y (June 2007). "Distinct functional domains of neurofibromatosis type 1 regulate immediate versus long-term memory formation". The Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (25): 6852–7. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0933-07.2007. PMC 6672704. PMID 17581973.
  71. ^ Buchanan ME, Davis RL (July 2010). "A distinct set of Drosophila brain neurons required for neurofibromatosis type 1-dependent learning and memory". The Journal of Neuroscience. 30 (30): 10135–43. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0283-10.2010. PMC 2917756. PMID 20668197.
  72. ^ Weiss JB, Weber SJ, Torres ER, Marzulla T, Raber J (March 2017). "Genetic inhibition of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase rescues cognitive impairments in Neurofibromatosis 1 mutant mice". Behavioural Brain Research. 321: 148–156. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.003. PMID 28057529.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]