The website uses cookies to optimize your user experience. Using this website grants us the permission to collect certain information essential to the provision of our services to you, but you may change the cookie settings within your browser any time you wish. Learn more
I agree
Text direction?

Humidified high flow nasal cannula supportive therapy improves outcomes in lung transplant recipients readmitted to the intensive care unit because...


Send to

Choose Destination
Transplantation. 2015 May;99(5):1092-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000460.
Humidified high flow nasal cannula supportive therapy improves outcomes in lung transplant recipients readmitted to the intensive care unit because of acute respiratory failure.

Author information

1 Critical Care Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 2 CibeRes, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. 3 Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.



The effectiveness of humidified high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in lung transplant (LTx) recipients readmitted to intensive care unit (ICU) because of acute respiratory failure (ARF) has not been determined to date.


Retrospective analysis of a prospectively assessed cohort of LTx patients who were readmitted to ICU because of ARF over a 5-year period. Patients received conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or HFNC (Optiflow, Fisher & Paykel, New Zealand) supportive therapy according to the attending physician's criteria. Treatment failure was defined as the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation (MV).


Thirty-seven LTx recipients required ICU readmission, with a total of 40 episodes (18 COT vs. 22 HFNC). At ICU admission, no differences in comorbidities, pulmonary function, or median sequential organ failure assessment (COT, 4 [interquartile range, 4-6] vs. HFNC, 4 [interquartile range, 4-7]; P = 0.51) were observed. Relative risk of MV in patients with COT was 1.50 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02-2.21). The absolute risk reduction for MV with HFNC was 29.8%, and the number of patients needed to treat to prevent one intubation with HFNC was 3. Multivariate analysis showed that HFNC therapy was the only variable at ICU admission associated with a decreased risk of MV (odds ratio, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.02-0.69]; P = 0.02). Moreover, nonventilated patients had an increased survival rate (20.7% vs. 100%; relative rate 4.83 [95% CI, 2.37-9.86]; P < 0.001). No adverse events were associated with HFNC use.


HFNC O2 therapy is feasible and safe and may decrease the need for MV in LTx recipients readmitted to the ICU because of ARF.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Related Notes
Get a free MyMarkup account to save this article and view it later on any device.
Create account

End User License Agreement

Summary | 1 Annotations
Send to jQuery(document).ready( function () { jQuery("#send_to_menu input[type='radio']").click( function () { var selectedValue = jQuery(this).val().toLowerCase(); var selectedDiv = jQuery("#send_to_menu div." + selectedValue); if(selectedDiv.is(":hidden")){ jQuery("#send_to_menu div.submenu:visible").slideUp(); selectedDiv.slideDown(); } }); }); jQuery("#sendto").bind("ncbipopperclose", function(){ jQuery("#send_to_menu div.submenu:visible").css("display","none"); jQuery("#send_to_menu input[type='radio']:checked").attr("checked",false); }); Choose DestinationFileClipboardCollectionsE-mailOrderMy BibliographyCitation managerFormatSummary (text)Abstract (text)MEDLINEXMLPMID ListCSVCreate File1 selected item: 25340596FormatSummarySummary (text)AbstractAbstract (text)MEDLINEXMLPMID ListMeSH and Other DataE-mailSubjectAdditional textE-mailDidn't get the message? Find out why...Add to ClipboardAdd to CollectionsOrder articlesAdd to My BibliographyGenerate a file for use with external citation management software.Create File Transplantation. 2015 May;99(5):1092-8.
2018/07/29 06:25